Friday 27 February 2015

Rosas Danst Rosas Review

Rosas Danst Rosas is a dance structures in 5 sections and themed around the stimulus of human behaviour and rage by the company ‘Rosas’. The choreographer of the dance is Anne Teresa de Keersmaeker. Although it was first performed in 1983 as a live performance a filmed version was shot in 1997.
The dancers consist of 4 women who dance in an energetic and dynamic style. Dressed in every day wear such as black clothing with loose fitting clothes such as skirts. I think this gives a good effect towards the audience from the dancers as black has connotations of mystery as well as power.
The set in the sections I am studying, Sections 2, 3 and 5 was mainly open with the addition to a few chairs in section three, and I think little staging was used in the mis-en-scene to keep the viewers concentrated on the dancers.
The dance takes place in an empty school littered with large classrooms in Belgium, a perfect location for a dance to give the impression of a moment lost in time. With the natural light from the windows and coming through gaps in the doors helped create a simple atmosphere to maintain the focus of the audience on the movements and theme of the dance.
Sound was a strong feature as most of it came from natural movements from the dancers which also were loud at a close sonic perspective so we could hear the breathing and movements of the dancers clearly and as if they were close to us; this would help the viewer relate to the dancers and immerse them more deeply into the messages, values and themes presented by the choreographer, Anne.
The music was also important as I think it created suspense and dynamics to the dance which other forms of music would struggle with, such as aiding in making the movements and structure fluent but strong. An example of this is when the music picks up and the movement by the dancers become more rapid, this contributing to the tension it generates.
Camera angles and types of shots were incredibly important in making the dance successful, I like to believe that the live performance performed before the filmed version was made in 1997 was a completely different experience, as compared to the live one the filmed could use tools such as sonic perspective, editing and camera shots to their advantage. An example of this is during a chair scene, the camera pans around the dancers, shooting around pillars which gives the effect that we’re watching them, much like someone would look at a piece of art. Tracking shots were used during the section two of the dance, where the dancers would use the floor and levels to show status and control.
Music and camera shots were used together to create tension, an example of this is during most of the structures as the rhythm gets more intense with the movements.
Other camera placements were used such as close ups/extreme close up were used to give perspective and help the audience compare and contrast feelings with the dancers. The establishing shot was used to show the dancers placement before they began dancing. Shots which frame the dancer(s) such as long shots, extra-long shots or even framing through window and doors were effective to give a clear image of the big movements and choreographic devices used by the dances, especially in the chair scene as the window were used at a long shot to frame the dancers. All shots were used with still cameras (ie no hand help cameras).
Choreographic devices such as levels, cannon, change of tempo through the music and repetition were all used to create a complete dance with a large variety of structure, used effectively with the mis-en-scene (what is in the shots/what is in the set) such as the chairs and the floor. I think a lot of time was spent to fix the camera shots and editing of the music around the dancing. Canon was also used whilst on the chairs to show the repetition of movements and how powerful they were.